ລິ້ງ ສຳຫລັບເຂົ້າຫາ

ວັນເສົາ, ໒໗ ກໍລະກົດ ໒໐໒໔

ປ. ທ​ຣຳ ກ່າວ​ວ່າ ທ່ານ​ມີ​ສິດ ຕາມ​ກົດ​ໝາຍ ທີ່​ຈະ​ແຊກແຊງ ຄະ​ດີ​ຕ່າງໆ


ປະ​ທາ​ນາ​ທິບ​ໍ​ດີ ດໍ​ໂນ​ລ ທ​ຣຳ ພວມ​ຖະ​ແຫຼງ ໃນ​ລະ​ຫວ່າງ​ການ​ພົບ​ປະ ກັບ​ປະ​ທາ​ນາ​ທິ​ບໍ​ດີ​ເອກວາ​ດໍ ທ່ານ​ເລ​ນິນ ມໍ​ເຣ​ໂນ ທີ່​ທຳ​ນຽບ​ຂາວ ເມື່ອ​ວັນ​ທີ 12 ກຸມ​ພາ ປີ 2020.
ປະ​ທາ​ນາ​ທິບ​ໍ​ດີ ດໍ​ໂນ​ລ ທ​ຣຳ ພວມ​ຖະ​ແຫຼງ ໃນ​ລະ​ຫວ່າງ​ການ​ພົບ​ປະ ກັບ​ປະ​ທາ​ນາ​ທິ​ບໍ​ດີ​ເອກວາ​ດໍ ທ່ານ​ເລ​ນິນ ມໍ​ເຣ​ໂນ ທີ່​ທຳ​ນຽບ​ຂາວ ເມື່ອ​ວັນ​ທີ 12 ກຸມ​ພາ ປີ 2020.

ປະ​ທາ​ນາ​ທິ​ບໍ​ດີ​ສະ​ຫະ​ລັດທ່ານດໍ​ໂນ​ລ ທ​ຣຳ ກ່າວ​ວ່າ ທ່ານ​ມີ “ສິດຕາມກົດໝາຍ” ທີ່​ຈະ​ແຊກ​ແຊງຄະ​ດີ​ອາ​ຍາ​ຕ່າງໆ ຫຼັງ​ຈາກ​ລັດ​ຖະ​ມົນ​ຕີ​ກະ​ຊວງ​ຍຸ​ຕິ​ທຳ ທ່ານ​ວິ​ລ​ລຽມ ບາ​ ໄດ້ຕ້ອງ​ຕິ​ທ່ານ ​ໃນ​ການ​ສົ່ງ​ຂໍ້​ຄວາມ​ທາງ​ທວິດ​ເຕີ້ ກ່ຽວ​ກັບ​ບັນ​ດາ​ຄະ​ດີຕ່າງໆ​ຂອງກະ​ຊວງ​ຍຸ​ຕິ​ທຳ.

ການ​ສົ່ງ​ຂໍ້​ຄວາມ​ຂອງ​ປະ​ທາ​ນາ​ທິບໍ​ດີ​ທ​ຣຳ ​ໃນຕອນ​ເຊົ້າ​ວັນ​ສຸກວານ​ນີ້ ​ມີ​ຂຶ້ນ​ບໍ່ດົນ ​ຫຼັງ​ຈາກທ່ານ​ບາ​ ກ່າວ​ຢູ່​ໃນ​ການ​ໃຫ້​ສຳ​ພາດ​ກັບ​ໂທ​ລະ​ພາບ ABC ໃນ​ວັນ​ພະ​ຫັດ​ທີ່​ຜ່ານ​ມາ​ວ່າ ປະ​ທາ​ນາ​ທິ​ບໍ​ດີ​ທ​ຣຳຂຽນຂໍ້​ຄວາມ​ລົງ​ໃນ​ທວີດ​ເຕີ້ກ່ຽວ​ກັບ​ກະ​ຊວງ​ຍຸ​ຕິ​ທຳ ​ພວກພະ​ນັກ​ງານແລະ​ຄະ​ດີ​ຕ່າງ​ໆ​ນັ້ນ “ເຮັດ​ໃຫ້​ເປັນ​ໄປ​ບໍ່​ໄດ້ໃນການ​ປະ​ຕິ​ບັດ​ງານ​ຂອງ​ຂ້າ​ພະ​ເຈົ້າ.” ນອກ​ນັນ ທ່ານ​ບາ​ ຍັງ​ກ່າວ​ວ່າ ທ່ານ​ທ​ຣຳ “ບໍ່​ເຄີຍ​ຂໍ​ຮ້ອງ​ທ່ານ​ໃຫ້​ເຮັດ​ຫຍັງ​ໝົດ​ຢູ່​ໃນການດຳ​ເນີນ​ຄະ​ດີ​ອາ​ຍາ.”

ຢູ່​ໃນ​ການ​ຕອບ​ໂຕ້ນັ້ນ ທ່ານ​ທ​ຣຳ​ ໄດ້​ອ້າງ​ຄຳ​ເວົ້າ ຂອງ​ທ່ານ​ບາ​ ແລະ​ກ່າວ​ວ່າ “ນີ້​ບໍ່​ໄດ້​ໝາຍ​ຄ​ວາມ​ວ່າ ຂ້າ​ພະ​ເຈົ້າ​ບໍ່​ມີ ໃນ​ນາມ​ປະ​ທາ​ນາ​ທິ​ບໍ​ດີ ສິດ​ທິ​ຕາມ​ກົດ​ໝາຍ​ທີ່​ຈະ​ທຳ​ດັ່ງ​ກ່າວ ຂ້າ​ພະ​ເຈົ້າ​ມີ ເທົ່າ​ທີ່​ຜ່ານມາ ແຕ່ບໍ່ໄດ້​ເລືອກເຮັດ.”

ການ​ໂຕ້​ຕອບ​ກັ​ບ​ໄປ​ກັບ​ມາ ລະ​ຫວ່າງທ່ານ​ທ​ຣຳ ແລະ​ເຈົ້າ​ໜ້າ​ທີ່ປະ​ຕິ​ບັດກົດ​ໝາຍ​ສູງ​ສຸດ​ຂອງ​ທ່ານ ມີ​ຂຶ້ນ​ໃນ​ທ້າຍ​ອາ​ທິດ​ນີ້ ​ທີ່​ໄດ້ພາ​ໃຫ້​ມີຄຳ​ຖາມຕ່າງໆ​ ກ່ຽວ​ກັບ​ວ່າ ບົດ​ບາດ​ຂອງ​ປະ​ທາ​ນາ​ທິ​ບໍ​ດີ​ນັ້ນ​ສາ​ມາດມີ​ຫຼາຍໄດ້ປານ​ໃດ ​ຢູ່​ໃນ​ລະ​ບົບ​ກົດ​ໝາຍ​ສະ​ຫະ​ລັດ.

ໃນ​ຕົ້ນ​ອາ​ທິດ​ນີ້ ທ່ານ​ທ​ຣຳ​ໄດ້​ຕ້ອງ​ຕິ​ຜູ້​ພິ​ພາ​ກ​ສາ ​ຄະ​ນະຕຸ​ລາ​ການ ແລະ​ບັນ​ດາ​ໄອ​ຍະ​ການໃນ​ຄະ​ດີອາ​ຍາຂອງທ່ານ​ໂຣ​ເຈີ ສ​ໂຕນ ຜູ້​ໄວ້​ເນື້ອ​ເຊື່ອ​ໃ​ຈ​ມາ​ເປັນ​ເວ​ລາ​ດົນ​ນານ​ຂອງ​ທ່ານ ​ໂດຍຕຳ​ນິ​ວ່າ ເຈັດ​ປີຫາ​ເກົ້າ​ປີຂອງ​ການ​ລົງ​ໂທດ ​ທີ່​ໄດ້​ສ​ະ​ເໜີ​ໃຫ້ສຳ​ລັບທ່ານ​ສ​ໂຕນ​ນັ້ນ ແມ່ນ “ໜ້າ​ຢ້ານ” ແລະ “​ບໍ່​ເປັນ​ທຳ.”

​ແຕ່ຫຼາຍຊົ່ວ​ໂມງ​ຕໍ່​ມາ ກະ​ຊວ​ຍຸ​ຕິ​ທຳ​ຂອງ​ທ່ານ​ບາ​ ໄດ້​ປະ​ຕິ​ເສດ​ບັນ​ດາ​ໄອ​ຍະ​ການ​ຂອງ​ຕົນ ແລະ​ໄດ້​ສະ​ເໜີໃຫ້ສານ​ຕັດ​ສິນລົງ​ໂທດ​ສ​ະ​ຖານ​ເບົາ​ກວ່າ​ເກົ່າ​ໃຫ້ແກ່​ທ່ານ​ ສ​ໂຕນ ທີ່ຖືກ​ພົບ​ເຫັນ​ວ່າ ມີ​ຄວາມ​ຜິດ​ຍ້ອນຫຼອກ​ລວງ​ລັດ​ຖະ​ສະ​ພາ, ຂັດ​ຂວາງ​ຂະ​ບວນ​ການ​ຍຸ​ຕິ​ທຳ ແລະແຊກ​ແຊງພະ​ຍານໃນ​ການ​ສືບ​ສວນ​ກ່ຽວ​ກັບ​ການ​ແຊກ​ແຊງ​ຂອງ​ຣັດ​ເຊຍຢູ່​ໃນ​ການ​ເລືອກ​ຕັ້ງ. ການ​ຕັດ​ສິນ​ໃນ​ດັ່ງ​ກ່າວ​ໄດ້​ເຮັດ​ໃຫ້​ໄອ​ຍະ​ການ​ສີ່​ຄົນຢູ່​ໃນ​ຄະ​ດີ​ຂອງ​ທ່ານ​ສ​ໂຕນ ພາ​ກັນ​ຖອນ​ໂຕອອກ​ຈາກ​ຄະ​ດີ ຮວມ​ທັງ​ອີກ​ຜູ​ນຶ່ງ​ໄດ້ລາ​ອອກ​ຈາກ​ກະ​ຊວງ​ພ້ອມ.

ທ່ານ​ບາ​ ປະ​ເຊີນ​ໜ້າ​ກັບ​ການ​ຕ້ອງ​ຕິຢ່າງ​ແຮງກ່ຽວ​ກັບການ​ຕັດ​ສິນ​ໃຈ ​ສ່ວນ​ໃຫຍ່ແລ້ວເພາະ​ວ່າ ​ໄດ້​ເກີດ​ຂຶ້ນ​ໃນທັນ​ທີ ຫຼັງ​ຈາກ​ການ​ຕໍ່​ວ່າຂອງປະ​ທາ​ນາ​ທິ​ບໍ​ດີ​ທ​ຣຳ ຢູ່​ໃນ​ການ​ສົ່ງ​ຂໍ້​ຄວາມ​ທາງ​ທວິດ​ເຕີ້ ແລະ​ໄດ້​ເຮັດ​ໃຫ້​ທ່ານ​ບາ​ ອອກ​ຖະ​ແຫຼງ​ການ​ທີ່​ບໍ່​ຄ່ອຍ​ມີ​ເພື່ອຕອບ​ໂຕ້​ຕໍ່ປະ​ທາ​ນາ​ທິ​ບໍ​ດີ.

U.S. President Donald Trump says he has the "legal right" to intervene in criminal cases after his Attorney General William Barr criticized him for tweeting about Justice Department cases.

Trump's Friday morning tweet came shortly after Barr said in an interview with ABC News Thursday that Trump's tweets about the Justice Department, its people, and its cases "make it impossible for me to do my job." Barr also said Trump "has never asked me to do anything in a criminal case."

In his response, Trump quoted Barr's words and said, "This doesn't mean that I do not have, as President, the legal right to do so, I do, but I have so far chosen not to!"

The back-and-forth between Trump and his top law enforcement official comes at the end of a week that has raised questions about how much of a role the president can have on the U.S. legal system.

Earlier this week, Trump criticized the judge, jury and prosecutors in the criminal case of his longtime friend Roger Stone, complaining that the seven-to-nine year recommended sentence for Stone was "horrible" and "unfair."

Hours later, Barr's Justice Department overruled its own prosecutors and recommended a lighter prison sentence for Stone, convicted of lying to Congress, witness tampering and obstruction of justice in the Russian election meddling probe. The decision prompted four prosecutors in the Stone case to withdraw from the case, including one who resigned from the department.

Barr faced intense criticism for the decision, in large part because it came immediately after Trump's complaints on Twitter, and prompted Barr to issue a rare rebuke of the president.

"To have public statements and tweets about the department, about our people in the department...about cases pending in the department and about judges before whom we have cases make it impossible for me to do my job and to assure the courts and the prosecutors in the department that we're doing our work with integrity," Barr told ABC.

"I'm not going to be bullied or influenced by anybody, whether it's Congress, a newspaper editorial board, or the president," Barr added.

After the recommended sentence for Stone was cut, Trump tweeted his congratulations to Barr for "taking charge of a case that was totally out of control and perhaps should not have been brought."

But Trump denied asking Barr to intervene.

The situation has brought into question the Justice Department's historic independence from any political influence. Democrats have called for an investigation into what prompted the recommendation of a lighter sentence for Stone. Barr is set to testify before a House committee next month.

Stone is a veteran political consultant who served as an adviser to a number of Republican presidential candidates going back to Richard Nixon's 1972 re-election campaign.

He is a close Trump ally and adviser. A jury convicted him in November on seven counts of lying to investigators, witness tampering, and obstruction stemming from special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into whether the Trump campaign colluded with Russia to help Trump win the 2016 election.

Stone will be sentenced next week and it will be up to U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson to decide how long he should be in prison.

XS
SM
MD
LG