ໜັງສືພິມວໍຊິງຕັນ ໂພສທ໌ ລາຍງານວ່າ ໄອຍະການພິເສດ ທ່ານໂຣເບີຣຕ໌ມັລເລີ ໄດ້ສົ່ງ
ຈົດໝາຍໄປຫາລັດຖະມົນຕີ ກະຊວງຍຸຕິທຳ ທ່ານວິລລຽມ ບາຣ ໃນເດືອນມີນາ ຈົ່ມວ່າ
ກ່ຽວກັບເອກກະສານສະຫລຸບສີ່ໜ້າຂອງການພິສູດເລື້ອງທີ່ວ່າຣັດເຊຍຫຍຸ້ງກ່ຽວໃນການ
ເລືອກຕັ້ງທີ່ວ່າບໍ່ໄດ້ “ບອກເຖິງເນື້ອເລື້ອງຢ່າງທີ່ຖ້ວນ ທຳມະຊາດ ແລະຄວາມເປັນມາ”
ຂອງການສືບສວນດັ່ງກ່າວ.
ຂໍ້ສັງເກດຂອງທ່ານບາຣ ຕໍ່ສະພາ ແລະສາທາລະນະໄດ້ຕັ້ງໃຈທີ່ຈະພາດຫົວເລື້ອງການ
ສະຫລຸບຂອງທ່ານມັລເລີ ທີ່ໄດ້ບັນລຸຢູ່ໃນການສືບສວນອັນຍາວນານ ໄປສູ່ການທີ່ວ່າ
ປະທານາທິບໍດີສະຫະລັດ ທ່ານດໍໂນລ ທຣຳ ແລະໜ່ວຍໂຄສະນາຫາສຽງຂອງເພິ່ນສົມ
ຮູ້ຄວາມຄິດກັບຣັດເຊຍ ເພື່ອຫັນເຫການເລືອກຕັ້ງປີ 2016 ໃຫ້ມາເຫັນພ້ອມກັບ
ທ່ານທຣຳ.
ອີງຕາມໜັງສືພິມວໍຊິງຕັນ ໂພສທ໌ນັ້ນແມ່ນວ່າ ທ່ານມັລເລີ ໄດ້ຂຽນຫາທ່ານບາຣວ່າ
“ບັດນີ້ເປັນທີ່ສັບສົນໃຫ້ແກ່ສາທາລະ ກ່ຽວກັບຄວາມຄິດເຫັນຂອງຜົນທີ່ອອກມາຂອງ
ການສືບສວນຂອງພວກເຮົາ. ນີ້ເປັນການຂົ່ມຂູ່ ທີ່ຈະທຳລາຍຄວາມຕັ້ງໃຈຕໍ່ອັນທີ່ກະ
ຊວງຍຸຕິທຳໄດ້ແຕ່ງຕັ້ງໄອຍະການພິເສດ ເພື່ອຄ້ຳປະກັນຄວາມເຊື່ອຖືຈາກສາທາລະ
ນະຊົນຢ່າງເຕັມທີ່ ໃນຜົນອອກມາຂອງການ
ສືບສວນຄັ້ງນີ້.
ບໍ່ເປັນທີ່ແຈ້ງຂາວຢ່າງສະເພາະເຈາະຈົງວ່າ ການບໍ່ເຫັນພ້ອມຂອງທ່ານມັລເລີ ຕໍ່ເອກ
ກະສານສີ່ໜ້າຂອງທ່ານບາຣ ທີ່ໄດ້ກ່າວວ່າ ທ່ານມັລເລີບໍ່ສາມາດພົບເຫັນຫລັກຖານ
ອັນໃດວ່າມີການຮວມຫົວກັນລະຫວ່າງທ່ານທຣຳ ກັບຣັດເຊຍ. ນອກນັ້ນຈົດໝາຍດັ່ງ
ກ່າວຍັງເວົ້າວ່າ ທ່ານມັລເລີ ບໍ່ໄດ້ເຮັດຂໍ້ສະຫລຸບວ່າ ທ່ານທຣຳຂັດຂວາງຂະບວນການ
ຍຸຕິທຳ ປ່ອຍໃຫ້ເລື້ອງດັ່ງກ່າວແກ່ທ່ານບາຣ ກັບທ່ານ ຣອດ ໂຣເຊນສໄຕນ໌ ຜູ້ຮອງ
ຂອງເພິ່ນ ເປັນຜູ້ລົງຄວາມເຫັນ.
ທັງສອງທ່ານກ່າວວ່າພວກເພິ່ນບໍ່ສາມາດພົບເຫັນຄວາມຕັ້ງໃຈໃດໆໃນການກະທຳ
ຜິດຢູ່ໃນພາກສ່ວນຂອງປະທານາທິບໍດີ.
ເອກກະສານຄວາມຊົງຈຳຂອງທ່ານບາຣ ໄດ້ນຳພາຫຼາຍຄົນໃຫ້ເຊື່ອວ່າປະທານາທິບໍດີ
ບໍ່ໄດ້ພະຍາຍາມທີ່ຈະເຮັດໃຫ້ປ່ຽນແປງທິດທາງຂອງການສືບສວນຂອງທ່ານມັລເລີ.
Special Counsel Robert Mueller sent a letter to Attorney General William Barr in March complaining his initial four-page summation of the Russian election probe failed to "fully capture the context, nature, and substance" of the investigation, The Washington Post reports.
Barr's note to Congress and the public was intended to highlight the conclusions Mueller reached in his long investigation into whether U.S. President Donald Trump and his campaign conspired with Russia to swing the 2016 election in Trump's favor.
According to the Post, Mueller wrote to Barr "there is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the (justice) department appointed the special counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigations."
It is unclear precisely what Mueller objected to in Barr's four-page memo which said that Mueller could not find evidence of a conspiracy between Trump and the Russians. It also said that Mueller made no conclusions whether Trump obstructed justice, leaving that matter to Barr and his deputy, Rod Rosenstein.
Both said they could not find any criminal intent on the president's part.
Barr's memo led many to believe that the president did not try to derail the Mueller probe.
But the redacted Mueller report released on April 18 painted a much more damning picture of Trump. It spelled out numerous instances of possible obstruction, but citied Justice Department policy that a sitting president cannot be indicted.
The Justice Department said Tuesday Barr had telephoned Mueller to discuss the special counsel's letter and that the conversation was "cordial and professional."
A spokeswoman said Mueller emphasized that nothing in Barr's four-page memo was "inaccurate or misleading," but that Mueller was upset by the "lack of context and resulting media coverage" on the obstruction question.
Barr is set to testify Wednesday before the Senate Judiciary Committee and will likely be asked why he decided the president did not obstruct justice. Mueller also plans to testify at a date to be announced.
While the Mueller report concluded that Trump and his campaign did not collude with Russia, it left many people confused and angry, believing the evidence of Trump's guilt, reluctance to fully cooperate, and his efforts to obstruct justice are clear.
Trump has alternately blasted Mueller and praised him as "honorable," but says the report exonerates him of any crime.
